ObjectivesTo report mastectomy and reoperation rates in women who had breast MRI for screening (S-MRI subgroup) or diagnostic (D-MRI subgroup) purposes, using multivariable analysis for investigating the role of MRI referral/nonreferral and other covariates in driving surgical outcomes.MethodsThe MIPA observational study enrolled women aged 18-80 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer destined to have surgery as the primary treatment, in 27 centres worldwide. Mastectomy and reoperation rates were compared using non-parametric tests and multivariable analysis.ResultsA total of 5828 patients entered analysis, 2763 (47.4%) did not undergo MRI (noMRI subgroup) and 3065 underwent MRI (52.6%); of the latter, 2441/3065 (79.7%) underwent MRI with preoperative intent (P-MRI subgroup), 510/3065 (16.6%) D-MRI, and 114/3065 S-MRI (3.7%). The reoperation rate was 10.5% for S-MRI, 8.2% for D-MRI, and 8.5% for P-MRI, while it was 11.7% for noMRI (p <= 0.023 for comparisons with D-MRI and P-MRI). The overall mastectomy rate (first-line mastectomy plus conversions from conserving surgery to mastectomy) was 39.5% for S-MRI, 36.2% for P-MRI, 24.1% for D-MRI, and 18.0% for noMRI. At multivariable analysis, using noMRI as reference, the odds ratios for overall mastectomy were 2.4 (p < 0.001) for S-MRI, 1.0 (p = 0.957) for D-MRI, and 1.9 (p < 0.001) for P-MRI.ConclusionsPatients from the D-MRI subgroup had the lowest overall mastectomy rate (24.1%) among MRI subgroups and the lowest reoperation rate (8.2%) together with P-MRI (8.5%). This analysis offers an insight into how the initial indication for MRI affects the subsequent surgical treatment of breast cancer.

Screening and diagnostic breast MRI: how do they impact surgical treatment? Insights from the MIPA study / Cozzi, Andrea; Di Leo, Giovanni; Houssami, Nehmat; Gilbert, Fiona J; Helbich, Thomas H; Álvarez Benito, Marina; Balleyguier, Corinne; Bazzocchi, Massimo; Bult, Peter; Calabrese, Massimo; Camps Herrero, Julia; Cartia, Francesco; Cassano, Enrico; Clauser, Paola; de Lima Docema, Marcos F; Depretto, Catherine; Dominelli, Valeria; Forrai, Gábor; Girometti, Rossano; Harms, Steven E; Hilborne, Sarah; Ienzi, Raffaele; Lobbes, Marc B I; Losio, Claudio; Mann, Ritse M; Montemezzi, Stefania; Obdeijn, Inge-Marie; Ozcan, Umit A; Pediconi, Federica; Pinker, Katja; Preibsch, Heike; Raya Povedano, José L; Rossi Saccarelli, Carolina; Sacchetto, Daniela; Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P; Schlooz, Margrethe; Szabó, Botond K; Taylor, Donna B; Ulus, Özden S; Van Goethem, Mireille; Veltman, Jeroen; Weigel, Stefanie; Wenkel, Evelyn; Zuiani, Chiara; Sardanelli, Francesco. - In: EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0938-7994. - 33:9(2023), pp. 6213-6225. [10.1007/s00330-023-09600-5]

Screening and diagnostic breast MRI: how do they impact surgical treatment? Insights from the MIPA study

Di Leo, Giovanni
Secondo
;
Dominelli, Valeria;Pediconi, Federica;Sardanelli, Francesco
Ultimo
2023

Abstract

ObjectivesTo report mastectomy and reoperation rates in women who had breast MRI for screening (S-MRI subgroup) or diagnostic (D-MRI subgroup) purposes, using multivariable analysis for investigating the role of MRI referral/nonreferral and other covariates in driving surgical outcomes.MethodsThe MIPA observational study enrolled women aged 18-80 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer destined to have surgery as the primary treatment, in 27 centres worldwide. Mastectomy and reoperation rates were compared using non-parametric tests and multivariable analysis.ResultsA total of 5828 patients entered analysis, 2763 (47.4%) did not undergo MRI (noMRI subgroup) and 3065 underwent MRI (52.6%); of the latter, 2441/3065 (79.7%) underwent MRI with preoperative intent (P-MRI subgroup), 510/3065 (16.6%) D-MRI, and 114/3065 S-MRI (3.7%). The reoperation rate was 10.5% for S-MRI, 8.2% for D-MRI, and 8.5% for P-MRI, while it was 11.7% for noMRI (p <= 0.023 for comparisons with D-MRI and P-MRI). The overall mastectomy rate (first-line mastectomy plus conversions from conserving surgery to mastectomy) was 39.5% for S-MRI, 36.2% for P-MRI, 24.1% for D-MRI, and 18.0% for noMRI. At multivariable analysis, using noMRI as reference, the odds ratios for overall mastectomy were 2.4 (p < 0.001) for S-MRI, 1.0 (p = 0.957) for D-MRI, and 1.9 (p < 0.001) for P-MRI.ConclusionsPatients from the D-MRI subgroup had the lowest overall mastectomy rate (24.1%) among MRI subgroups and the lowest reoperation rate (8.2%) together with P-MRI (8.5%). This analysis offers an insight into how the initial indication for MRI affects the subsequent surgical treatment of breast cancer.
2023
breast neoplasms; breast-conserving surgery; magnetic resonance imaging; mastectomy; reoperation
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Screening and diagnostic breast MRI: how do they impact surgical treatment? Insights from the MIPA study / Cozzi, Andrea; Di Leo, Giovanni; Houssami, Nehmat; Gilbert, Fiona J; Helbich, Thomas H; Álvarez Benito, Marina; Balleyguier, Corinne; Bazzocchi, Massimo; Bult, Peter; Calabrese, Massimo; Camps Herrero, Julia; Cartia, Francesco; Cassano, Enrico; Clauser, Paola; de Lima Docema, Marcos F; Depretto, Catherine; Dominelli, Valeria; Forrai, Gábor; Girometti, Rossano; Harms, Steven E; Hilborne, Sarah; Ienzi, Raffaele; Lobbes, Marc B I; Losio, Claudio; Mann, Ritse M; Montemezzi, Stefania; Obdeijn, Inge-Marie; Ozcan, Umit A; Pediconi, Federica; Pinker, Katja; Preibsch, Heike; Raya Povedano, José L; Rossi Saccarelli, Carolina; Sacchetto, Daniela; Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P; Schlooz, Margrethe; Szabó, Botond K; Taylor, Donna B; Ulus, Özden S; Van Goethem, Mireille; Veltman, Jeroen; Weigel, Stefanie; Wenkel, Evelyn; Zuiani, Chiara; Sardanelli, Francesco. - In: EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0938-7994. - 33:9(2023), pp. 6213-6225. [10.1007/s00330-023-09600-5]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cozzi_Screening and diagnostic_2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.53 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.53 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1683718
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact